They say a picture is worth 1000 words.
‘Pelase’ don’t say something like this on your web church’s site
(the sign is bad enough):
- Always test your new code.
- Mistakes like can really detract from your site’s content …
- I always get the help of a third partly before going live.
NOTE – Sorry guys, but I’m recycling an old article for new commentary. First, because it was published almost two years ago, second because I’m very tired, and though I have some geek things to say … I’m falling asleep on the keyboard.
March 4, 2004 at 6:20 pm
So, April 30, 2004??? Recycling the future ;->
March 5, 2004 at 5:29 am
Please tell me it says “I always get the help of a third partly before going live.” as a joke. Please?
March 5, 2004 at 9:55 am
And to follow up on Sparticus’ comment, “Mistakes like can really …” is a dropped word or a throwback to the “valley speak” days, right?
I still like the sign I saw several years ago, trite as it might have been:
Welcome to Ch–ch. What’s missing?
March 5, 2004 at 12:51 pm
and
“on your web church’s site”
March 5, 2004 at 1:53 pm
Laughing OUT LOUD!!!
March 5, 2004 at 2:12 pm
Proof-readers is always preferrable, but when you’re a one-man-show on a shoesting-budget it’s not a luxury we can all afford. 8^)
March 5, 2004 at 4:45 pm
Yes, of course included some typos.
It was supposed to enhance the humor, not give you guys a chance to gang up on me while I’m outta town.
Sheesh, miss one day and everyone gets cranky!-)
March 6, 2004 at 4:28 pm
I didn’t even notice the typos! Weird. I guess I’m just used to reading blogs rather than edited content. The point remains valid, though, since most people expect church websites to be perfect.
March 6, 2004 at 4:28 pm
I didn’t even notice the typos! Weird. I guess I’m just used to reading blogs rather than edited content. The point remains valid, though, since most people expect church websites to be perfect.
March 6, 2004 at 4:28 pm
I didn’t even notice the typos! Weird. I guess I’m just used to reading blogs rather than edited content. The point remains valid, though, since most people expect church websites to be perfect.