Teaching, rebuking, correcting & training in righteous web design.

‘Pelase’ Proof Read

March 4th, 2004 Posted in Titus 2:7

They say a picture is worth 1000 words.
‘Pelase’ don’t say something like this on your web church’s site
(the sign is bad enough):

Don't let worries kill you - Let the church help.

  • Always test your new code.
  • Mistakes like can really detract from your site’s content …
  • I always get the help of a third partly before going live.

NOTE - Sorry guys, but I’m recycling an old article for new commentary. First, because it was published almost two years ago, second because I’m very tired, and though I have some geek things to say … I’m falling asleep on the keyboard.

%DIGG%
Share This

Stumble it!

  1. 10 Responses to “‘Pelase’ Proof Read”

  2. By Ian McKenzie on Mar 4, 2004

    So, April 30, 2004??? Recycling the future ;->

  3. By Sparticus on Mar 5, 2004

    Please tell me it says “I always get the help of a third partly before going live.” as a joke. Please?

  4. By David Engel on Mar 5, 2004

    And to follow up on Sparticus’ comment, “Mistakes like can really …” is a dropped word or a throwback to the “valley speak” days, right?

    I still like the sign I saw several years ago, trite as it might have been:

    Welcome to Ch–ch. What’s missing?

  5. By Randy on Mar 5, 2004

    and

    “on your web church’s site”

  6. By timsamoff on Mar 5, 2004

    Laughing OUT LOUD!!! :)

  7. By leon on Mar 5, 2004

    Proof-readers is always preferrable, but when you’re a one-man-show on a shoesting-budget it’s not a luxury we can all afford. 8^)

  8. By Mean Dean on Mar 5, 2004

    Yes, of course included some typos.

    It was supposed to enhance the humor, not give you guys a chance to gang up on me while I’m outta town.

    Sheesh, miss one day and everyone gets cranky!-)

  9. By Justin Baeder on Mar 6, 2004

    I didn’t even notice the typos! Weird. I guess I’m just used to reading blogs rather than edited content. The point remains valid, though, since most people expect church websites to be perfect.

  10. By Justin Baeder on Mar 6, 2004

    I didn’t even notice the typos! Weird. I guess I’m just used to reading blogs rather than edited content. The point remains valid, though, since most people expect church websites to be perfect.

  11. By Justin Baeder on Mar 6, 2004

    I didn’t even notice the typos! Weird. I guess I’m just used to reading blogs rather than edited content. The point remains valid, though, since most people expect church websites to be perfect.

You must be logged in to post a comment.