BBSpot asks: Which OS are You?
Read’m and weep girls! Not bad considering some of the other possible results.
BBSpot asks: Which OS are You?
Read’m and weep girls! Not bad considering some of the other possible results.
As I pointed out in my previous article, “where the heck is my domain name?“, nothing ruins one’s morning worse than waking up and finding your (former) domain name for your church now redirects unsuspecting visitors to a grotesque gaggle of naked Russian women.
And just to drive the point home, I’ve collected a series of articles that I hope will scare the boogers out of you enough to go check the ownership and status of your church’s domain name(s) — and then tatoo the expiration date to your forehead and arm.
One of my more frequent reads, the Register, is running a very informative series of article entitled “Where the hell is my website?.” The third installment in this series, “A punter’s guide to keeping hold of your domain” offers several points you should print out and keep by your computer. Or at least keep in the notebook or folder you use to manage your site. You do keep such records and notes don’t you?! More on that later.
The bottom line is that some of you lose your church web sites because you lose control or ownership of your domain name. So, here for your convenience, are just the bullet points without the excellent explanations offered in the aforementioned article with some emphasis on one particular point I find VERY important.
Meaning, when you get a chance, read the article. In fact, read the entire series or you too might find yourself dying a thousand painful deaths when you wake up one morning, type in your church’s domain name, only to find yourself redirected to a pr0n site:
Here is an interesting article by way of UC Berkeley’s Computing and Communications newsletter. It offers an exhaustive description of the various methods one can employ to fend off evil spammers (yes, I know those last two words are redundant).
Here are some bullet points of the various tactics you can employ on your church web site:
Now go read the article and read the pros and cons of each of the above methods.
Mark Pilgrim reverses a previous position on CSS hackery by handling browser differences with mod_rewrite. The end effect is that each page links to two stylesheets: mu.css and om.css. Everybody gets mu.css, and the bulk of his styles are defined there. But for browser-specific workarounds, om.css gets redirected based on rules Mark set up in his .htaccess file.
An interesting approach I’ll be keeping my eye on. Meanwhile, here’s some more goodies on mod_rewrite we’ve previously discussed here at HealYourChurchWebSite:
It’s technoBlog Thursday and I’ve got a full schedule. That said, I’m enjoying visits from quite a few new visitors. So I thought maybe it’d be useful to offer a church web site critique that also reviewed some of the major points I’ve covered in the past.
Point 1 – remember is that my mission here is to “Build the Body of Christ by Helping Others Build Better Web Sites.” So when I critique a site, please do not take it as an attack on one’s faith or devotion to God. Do not take it as an attack on a particular church or person. It is merely offered as constructive criticism on this public forum so all of us, including myself, can benefit from the example. Or as it says in Proverbs 19:25b “… a sensible person learns by being corrected.”
So with all that said and done, let us take a look at the Brotherhood Freewill Baptist Church in Glasgow, KY.
Point 2 – Get Real! That is, if you want seekers to take you seriously, you need to spend just a few dollars on a domain name, and just a few more on a web host. I mean, what does it say about your church when as soon as they load your page you are confronted with pop-up ads for gambling casinos or an R-Rated film? And how well will you sleep at night realizing that your data is not your own, or that it’s not very recoverable? Free web hosts like Tripod are great when you’re just learning how to get things done, “But solid food is for the mature …”
Point 3 – ‘Pelase’ Proof Read – Check out your <title> tag. What does this say to search engines and seekers? Actually, instead of correcting the spelling, why not replace it with text that is meaningful to search engines and seekers, such as the name and location of the church? You’ll get more hits, and from that, more visitors.
Point 4 – Optimal Image Sizes – I don’t know how many times I’ve said this, but I know I said it earlier this week. The <img> tag does not, I repeat, DOES NOT, physically reduce the size of an image. Which is why P1010009.JPG, the one of the church on the front page without the benefit of an “alt” argument description, adds 349842 bytes to your web page! Considering that the entire page should be under 50k, this picture is a killer for seekers with dial-up connections. It wasn’t so fast on my DSL either. You need to physically reduce the image with a graphics editing application. You may also want to use the same application to brighten up the picture – it looks very couldy and somewhat dreary. Yet another reason buildings don’t make for good front page content. Too impersonal.
Point 5 – Evil Marquee Tag – Scrolling Banners and other similar gizmotchies aren’t slick, nor do they bring anything to anyone’s attention. They merely take your valuable and compelling content and make then unreadable, unsearchable and often unusable.
Point 6 – Above the Fold – Just like a newspaper, position the killer content of your frontpage in such a way that one does not have to scroll down to see it. “He will lift your heart” is a great slogan, but that and the waterfalls, along with the huge name of the church at the top squeeze out everything else. Less header, more of the good stuff.
Point 7 – Content is King – and this page has content. That’s what REALLY bothers me about this site. They’ve got tons of compelling content, but the problems I stated above, along with a few minor ones I didn’t, the web servanthas effectively hide this church’s light under a basket. And its a crying shame because they’ve got sermons, photos, schedules, directions, sections for various ministries. Its all there and organized. But because of all the pop-ups, the long load times and the oversized header, it is doubtful anyone will find it other than existing members using a Mozilla-based browser with the ad-blocking turned on and the graphics turned off. Considering a majority of people browse with the Microsoft product, I’d suggest the following healing steps.
First Impessions count for everything in this arena. Make sure your’s is one that’s memorable for a whole variety of good things.
For the next 12 hours, I’m leaving this mistake up on the Events and Opportunities at Redland Baptist Church, Rockville Maryland page.
Can you guess what went wrong? Here’s a hint.
Yes, that’s me laughing at myself in the background.
* UPDATE * – okay, most of you caught the time stamp … one especially funny comment about not being able to ‘stomach our fellowship meal times’ [LOL]
Okay , now there’s one more error … or should I say ‘deficiency of excess‘ I need to address. Any takers? Solutions in SQL are acceptable.
* UPDATE *
Yup – a maximum date range might be nice. Not that we don’t want to tell people what we’re doing, but there is a concept at churches known as “too much information” … anyone who’s worked with you ministry will get it !-)
I wanted to clarify a point I made earlier today, I posted the daytime version of a house in my neighborhood in which the Spirit of Christmas is mistaken with animated light-up snowmen and flashing lights. Much the same way some churches mistake animated spinning crosses and ‘Flash’ing text for content. Don’t Do This!
You may think its neat. Your pastor may think its neat. But your visitors are going to get frustrated, irritated or not take you seriously and move on the next church site down the block. Similarly, you are likely to find existing church members will ingore the site altogether. If nothing else, remember that content is king!
You can click on this image to see just how much light was flooded into my camera, to the point I didn’t even need a flash or a tripod! But before you call over your co-worker, ask yourself, “does my church website look this house?”
Of course the question my wife wants to know is , “where do they store all that stuff?” You’ll see what I mean when I take a picture of the same house round-about Easter-time.