<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For you BNF fans &#8211; CodeWorker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healyourchurchwebsite.com/2003/08/22/for-you-bnf-fans-codeworker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healyourchurchwebsite.com/2003/08/22/for-you-bnf-fans-codeworker/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=for-you-bnf-fans-codeworker</link>
	<description>Teaching, rebuking, correcting &#38; training in righteous web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedric Lemaire</title>
		<link>http://healyourchurchwebsite.com/2003/08/22/for-you-bnf-fans-codeworker/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric Lemaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healyourchurchwebsite.com/2003/08/22/for-you-bnf-fans-codeworker#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that CodeWorker appears as a tool for playing with BNF! It might be seen more like a code generator than like a tool for building computer languages.
In fact, CodeWorker is a scripting language for generating code in a very flexible way. But first, it has to be feed with requirements specification, written in a Domain Specific Language (DSL) that you consider as adapted to your needs.
The BNF is used to express the grammar of your DSL. If you just need a XML representation, don&#039;t worry about the DSL: CodeWorker already provides a XML parser in the script repository on the Web site.
Normally, you don&#039;t use this BNF for describing a programming langage. But why not? I wrote a light C++ parser (light meaning that it doesn&#039;t manage macros), and I use it for checking source code (according to programming rules) or for generating UML class diagrams in PNG (I have built a DSL for describing class diagrams in a very declarative way).

So, if you need a DSL, perhaps could you have a look to CodeWorker (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codeworker.org)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.codeworker.org)&lt;/a&gt; rather than using XML + Xerces or something else.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that CodeWorker appears as a tool for playing with BNF! It might be seen more like a code generator than like a tool for building computer languages.<br />
In fact, CodeWorker is a scripting language for generating code in a very flexible way. But first, it has to be feed with requirements specification, written in a Domain Specific Language (DSL) that you consider as adapted to your needs.<br />
The BNF is used to express the grammar of your DSL. If you just need a XML representation, don&#8217;t worry about the DSL: CodeWorker already provides a XML parser in the script repository on the Web site.<br />
Normally, you don&#8217;t use this BNF for describing a programming langage. But why not? I wrote a light C++ parser (light meaning that it doesn&#8217;t manage macros), and I use it for checking source code (according to programming rules) or for generating UML class diagrams in PNG (I have built a DSL for describing class diagrams in a very declarative way).</p>
<p>So, if you need a DSL, perhaps could you have a look to CodeWorker (<a href="http://www.codeworker.org)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.codeworker.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeworker.org</a>) rather than using XML + Xerces or something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

