Comments on: 5 Things I Could Have Known …

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:59:10 +0000

Much better! It was so much easier to read this time.

The only dodgy sentence I picked up this time was: “I find it troubling that the anyone would create/modify an entire page of a site that is intended represent the entire Body”

By: MeanDean

MeanDean — Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:14:54 +0000

YUP – and thanks for the heads-up … it was long – and very early in the A.M.

I should know better (saying this while pulling the plank outta my eye). Sure whish MT had a spell check!

Check it again (don’t forget to flush your cache) – let me know if its still crazy.

Dean

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:31:54 +0000

Dean, I love your work, but please! Proof read! This post is a shocker, especially towards the end. You have a big problem with omitting and repeating words.

And good spelling brings much healing.

By: Bene Diction

Bene Diction — Mon, 08 Jul 2002 21:18:06 +0000

C’est bon. It could have been c’est le gere!

By: MeanDean

MeanDean — Mon, 08 Jul 2002 19:57:18 +0000

Martin, in fairness, these three sites did not ask to be critiqued – so I can understand someone getting their feathers a bit ruffled at first – still – it’s not like my advice isn’t well founded. C’est la vie’

By: Bene Diction

Bene Diction — Mon, 08 Jul 2002 19:54:19 +0000

Goodness. I’m glad you can laugh, I popped over to both URL’s and the fact this dude used the front page to rubutt your comments says much more than his meager defense of his work. Why would someone ask for assistance and then defend the indefensible? Proverbs 18:2….A rebel doesn’t care about the facts. All he wants to do is yell”.
I feel sorry for this guy, more than his web page needs correction.